![]() | We'll help you achieve error-free job performance...world-wide |
|
Home Contact Us About Us Structured OJT System Train-the-Trainer Course ~ Off-the-Shelf Version OJT Trainer Course ~ Instructional Skills - Content-Free Microteaching® ~ Development Skills ~ Training Materials ~ Instructor Selection Test® Advantages of Our System Clients' Comments Case Studies FAQs |
The Instructor Selection
Test is a standardized, objective test of the ability to explain.
It is a component of the OJT System, and is also available for use
in classroom or supervisor training programs.
Good instructors should, at minimum, be better than average in each of these three characteristics. Ideally, they would be selected from those who are in the top quarter or fifth of each characteristic, as shown in these three normal curves (above). By definition, people's aptitudes for teaching range from low to high, and research has shown there is no positive correlation between teaching aptitude and the desire to teach, personality, or technical skills. (Nor with education, experience, age, or a number of other common determinants.) As is true for all aptitudes, aspiring instructors will range in teaching aptitude from very low to very high, with most considered average. This is shown in this curve (below).
While people can be selected for the first three characteristics based on what they have already done, they typically aren't selected on their ability to teach their knowledge to others because their ability to do that isn't known. What is needed in order to have the most effective and efficient training is a test to select those who have the most aptitude for teaching — those in the top quarter or fifth of the applicants, and who would become the best instructors. Description of the test: The Instructor Selection Test (IST) is the only objective test of instructor skill. It measures how well people perform in the basic teaching skill — explaining. The ability to explain how things work and how to do things (concepts, principles, procedures, and processes) is the key to effective and efficient instruction. The test has four components:
Using the IST, it is easy to identify those with the most potential to become good instructors. During the test, the examinee explains to students, one at a time, how to assemble the object. The time it takes for the students to assemble the object is measured with a stop watch. Times taken by examinees range from five to fifteen minutes, with an average of ten minutes. The IST measures efficiency. It is based on the premise that the most effective instructors are also the most efficient. If an instructor applicant must continue to explain until the students understand the content, the time taken can be used as a measure of efficiency. Those instructors who seem to be the most clear and understandable also are those from whom people learn the fastest. This premise has been tested and proven: faster and more efficient learning is caused by better instructors.The IST's validity was established at the Air Force's 5½-week-long master instructor course at the Air University's Academic Instructor School. A correlation study was conducted in which the times taken to teach the assembly process were compared with instructors' ratings of the teaching skills of explaining, clarifying, summarizing and achieving objectives, during practice teaching lessons. Low times were found to correspond to high ratings. A correlation of .71 was at the .001 confidence level. The correlation found during the research study in teaching one student is heightened in the current test by using two or three students. And, the odds that the short times of instruction demonstrated by highly rated instructors and the longer times by less able instructors were coincidental is less than one in a thousand. Applications The Instructor Selection Test works. Because of the clear connection between the test scores and instructor effectiveness, the IST provides a valid selection test for purposes of employment and job assignment. This is essential for complying with Federal equal employment opportunity requirements and avoiding job discrimination litigation. The IST can be used with all types of content and skill areas. Its content-free basis enables its use for qualifying or screening instructors in all subjects, including management, sales, medical, customer service, and technical training. It can also be used to screen applicants for supervisory positions, inasmuch as one of the primary roles of supervisors is to explain how and why things should be done.Case Study of Its Use Assume as a training manager, you need another instructor. You notify HR, which advertises internally. Five applicants are found. You check them out and find that
You schedule them to be tested the next day, one at 9 am and one at 10. When the first one comes in, you brief him and have him practice assembling the object he will explain. Then, you brief two office workers who have volunteered to be students.
You go back to the examinee after 20 minutes and find that he is ready. He feels he can explain how to assemble the object just by looking at the photo. You put away the model object and set up the student’s end of the table with the pieces to be assembled. The examinee and the student will be seated about 8 feet apart. You bring in the first volunteer and repeat the main points: to the student, don’t ask questions; and to the examinee, don’t point or ask questions. When they are ready, you say "Start" and you begin the stop watch. When the examinee is finished and the object has been assembled correctly, stop the watch. You find it took 13 minutes. You repeat the test with the same examinee and the second volunteer student and find that this lesson takes 11 minutes. You drop the 13 minutes from the first test and use the second test score of 11 as this examinee's score. You repeat this test with the second examinee at 10am. You find that her best time is 6.5 minutes. You also have become aware of some teaching traits of the two applicants that support the likelihood that the second examinee will be the better instructor. You select the second examinee to be the new trainer. The first examinee is satisfied because the numbers are reasonable and defensible. Even if the first examinee wasn’t satisfied, you would find that HR agrees with the results because the test is validated and meets EEO requirements. You have your new trainer. |
| |||||||||||||||